JOB MARKET REKT, BTC DOWNSIDE, SPX REVERSING, GOLD CONTINUING?
Krown · · 1:33:11 · Watch on YouTube
As of . Updated hourly as new videos are read.
BTC near publication: $66,0954-hour candle close · 27 Feb 2026, 16:00 UTC · BTC/USDT
ETH near publication: $1,9494-hour candle close · 27 Feb 2026, 16:00 UTC · ETH/USDT
On Bitcoin
Changed since their last video: months moved sideways to down; cycle flipped up to down.
Views
- Next days (next 1–7 days): Expects down (timeframe is our reading):
where is price action likely to go? very likely back down to these lows.
▶ 19:19 Said again while their call of 24 Feb 2026 was open, so it counts once; that call was wrong: 64k when said, 67.7k on 3 Mar 2026 (+5.9%). - Next months (next 2–6 months): Leans down (timeframe is our reading):
that Bitcoin is probably going to find a low in the mid- $50,000 territory
▶ 16:03 The call was right: 66.1k when said, 60.8k on 27 Jun 2026 (−8.0%). - This cycle (next 6–18 months): Leans down (timeframe is our reading):
downside bias remains and getting into the bearish control zone has generally not been good historically speaking.
▶ 21:21 Said again while their call of 6 Oct 2025 was open, so it counts once; that call was right: 124.2k when said, 86.2k on 6 Oct 2026 (−30.6%).
If this, then that
- If closure below 62,500 breaks the descending triangle lows, then 55k (next weeks):
closure below 62500. And that would imply a target all the way down to where? It would imply a target all the way down to about 55,000 bucks.
▶ 19:56 - If trading above Tuesday's high of 70,57x, then 75–80k (next weeks):
trading above the Tuesday high of 70,57 would very likely do it for me. And at that point, very likely looking at a move towards, you know, 75, maybe even 80,000 bucks.
▶ 18:39 - If quick wick down and weekly close back above 60,000, then no target given (next weeks):
close the weekly back above 60,000 bucks. If I see something like that, I would be, you know, a sort of low believer
▶ 20:08
Levels named
- 80k: Resistance (reversal above it would make hidden bullish divergence look like a real reversal rather than a pity bounce):
it would really have to pop back up and reverse above about 80,000 bucks before that looks like a you know like a reversal hidden bullish evidence
▶ 1:30:51 - 71.5k: Resistance (weekly stochastic pivot on CME; a close above would be an optimistic signal):
closing above the weekly stoastic pivot. It's very far away right now. Bless you, Elsa. Uh, but it would be 71,500.
▶ 26:50 - 68.3k: Resistance (Raven ribbon midband on the daily; below it downside bias remains):
as long as it's below 68,300, you know, downside bias remains.
▶ 17:33 - 62.5k: Support (equal lows of a descending triangle):
and we got same lows here at 63 or sorry, 62,500 or so.
▶ 19:45 - 55–60k: Target (area where a prolonged consolidation is expected):
but I'm still looking at this $55,000 to $60,000 area as very likely at least be getting at least be getting, you know, a much more prolonged consolidation.
▶ 16:51 - 55k: Target (implied target of the triangle breakdown):
closure below 62500. And that would imply a target all the way down to where? It would imply a target all the way down to about 55,000 bucks.
▶ 19:56
Their own position: Not said.
On Ethereum
No change since their last video.
Views
- Next days (next 1–7 days): Leans down (timeframe is our reading):
I have to be biased towards this thing coming back down to 1850, maybe even all the way back down specifically to 1,800.
▶ 52:18 The call was wrong: 1.95k when said, 1.98k on 6 Mar 2026 (+1.5%).
If this, then that
- If break below 1,800, then no target given (next weeks):
If you do break below $1,800, this thing will actually have an implied move probably another $200 lower. So somewhere around 15 to 1600 if that were to happen.
▶ 52:23
Levels named
- 1.8–1.85k: Target (hidden bearish divergence on the last lower high):
I have to be biased towards this thing coming back down to 1850, maybe even all the way back down specifically to 1,800.
▶ 52:18
Their own position: Not said.
4 items read from this video were left out: the quote or number could not be found in the captions.